Friday, July 1, 2016

Plagiarism to ‘academic fraud’, Pondicherry V-C’s Chandra Krishnamurthy term was mired in controversies,saked by President

Was served showcause notice after UGC panel found her guilty.

New Delhi | Express news service,Updated: June 30, 2016 5:58 am
President Pranab Mukherjee has given his nod to the Ministry of Human Resource Development’s proposal to sack Pondicherry University Vice-Chancellor Chandra Krishnamurthy, who faces charges of plagiarism and misrepresentation.
While Krishnamurthy had submitted her resignation earlier, a ministry official said “the resignation is not valid as it is not addressed to the competent authority, which is the Human Resource Development ministry. The ministry raised objection to her submitting the resignation letter to the President, but she didn’t comply. The recommendation to sack her was taken in consultation with the law ministry.”

The ministry sent the recommendation for her dismissal on June 26. Ministry officials said with the President clearing her dismissal, Krishnamurthy would not be able to take up a job in any government-run university.
Krishnamurthy was served a showcause notice last August asking why she should not be dismissed after a UGC panel found her guilty of plagiarism and misrepresentation. She was accused of academic fraud amid allegations of holding a fake PhD degree.
She was found to have plagiarised much of her book, in addition to listing two books in her CV which were never published. Soon after, the ministry appointed Anisa B Khan as the officiating Vice-Chancellor.
This is the second time the  HRD ministry has dismissed a Vice-Chancellor of a central university. Earlier, Visva Bharati Vice-Chancellor Sushanta Dattagupta was dismissed on charges of financial and administrative irregularities. 
Plagiarism to ‘academic fraud’, Pondicherry V-C’s term was mired in controversies

A case was also filed in the Madras HC on the violations committed by the then UPA regime in her selection.

Ever since Chandra Krishnamurthy took charge as Vice-Chancellor of Pondicherry University in November 2012, there was dissent, anger and a series of protests, by both students and faculty.
Her first two years were mired in controversies and allegations. From the reported renovation of the V-C’s bungalow at a cost of several lakhs to two ragging victims being punished — the Madras high court later fined the university — and transfer of officials and academics who questioned irregularities.
Image result for chandra krishnamurthy vc

Among those shunted out was then Registrar, Rajeev Yaduvanshi, who was repatriated to his parent department after he sent a number of reports to HRD Minister  on financial irregularities and statutory violations.

A case was also filed in the Madras HC on the violations committed by the then UPA regime in her selection.
Documents showed that then HRD Minister Pallam Raju recommended her name in the file forwarded to the President, although the rules state the ministry has to submit a list of three names in alphabetical order.
Then on November 22, 2014, The Indian Express reported that Krishnamurthy had plagiarised a book mentioned in her CV, which listed two other books that had not been published. Over 95 per cent of the book, which was also part of the Mumbai University curriculum, had been copied from papers authored by eminent law scholars, including Padma Shri N R Madhava Menon, founder of National Law School in Bengaluru.
And 24 of Krishnamurthy’s 25 research papers and publications listed in her CV — on legal and constitutional studies — did not exist in the UGC database or online repository for law schools.
Her CV was kept away from RTI provisions for several months, under ‘protected personal information’ category. Later, Yaduvanshi, using his appellate powers on an RTI appeal, made her CV available.
After Yaduvanshi’s repatriation, a group of professors of the Pondicherry University Teachers’ Association (PUTA) used modern character recognition and plagiarism software to expose the “academic fraud” in her 20-page CV. They also found that her D.Litt degree was fake, obtained from a fake Sri Lankan University — a finding that was confirmed by an HRD ministry probe panel later.
On Wednesday, Yaduvanshi, currently principal secretary of education in Andaman and Nicobar Islands, said the dismissal was essential to restore the university’s academic integrity. While Krishnamurthy was appointed by the UPA regime, she is reported to have enjoyed influence with the NDA administration too.
“Who will compensate for the time and energy we wasted to expose a corrupt V-C? Who will compensate for the number of academic days and research projects we lost in this four-year-long fight, just because the HRD ministry wanted to protect her? Why were both Pallam Raju and Smriti Irani lenient towards her, despite getting dozens of petitions and official reports on her academic fraud and corruption,” asked a faculty member who was attacked on the campus for joining the protests.
It was only in August 2015 that Krishnamurthy agreed to go on leave, on the suggestion of the HRD ministry.
Welcoming the President’s decision on Wednesday, Dastagiri Reddy, general secretary of the Pondicherry University Teachers’ Association (PUTA), demanded that Krishnamurthy’s salary be recovered and charges levied on the perks she enjoyed during her tenure as V-C.
  President Pranab Mukherjee has given his nod to the Ministry of Human Resource Development’s proposal to sack Pondicherry University Vice-Chancellor Chandra Krishnamurthy, who faces charges of plagiarism and misrepresentation.
While Krishnamurthy had submitted her resignation earlier, a ministry official said “the resignation is not valid as it is not addressed to the competent authority, which is the Human Resource Development ministry. The ministry raised objection to her submitting the resignation letter to the President, but she didn’t comply. The recommendation to sack her was taken in consultation with the law ministry.”
The ministry sent the recommendation for her dismissal on June 26. Ministry officials said with the President clearing her dismissal, Krishnamurthy would not be able to take up a job in any government-run university.

Krishnamurthy was served a showcause notice last August asking why she should not be dismissed after a UGC panel found her guilty of plagiarism and misrepresentation. She was accused of academic fraud amid allegations of holding a fake PhD degree.
She was found to have plagiarised much of her book, in addition to listing two books in her CV which were never published. Soon after, the ministry appointed Anisa B Khan as the officiating Vice-Chancellor.
This is the second time the  HRD ministry has dismissed a Vice-Chancellor of a central university. Earlier, Visva Bharati Vice-Chancellor Sushanta Dattagupta was dismissed on charges of financial and administrative irregularities.

Monday, June 27, 2016

PLAGIARIST TEACHER ( CHOR GURU) BEWARE


Thesis cheats beware! Academic plagiarism being made legal offence
  • Neelam Pandey, Hindustan Times, New Delhi
| Updated: Jun 26, 2016 08:12 IST

A law to make plaigiarism a legal offence is being drafted by the UGC after a raft of plagiarism charges against central and states universities  vice-chancellors and teachers in the recent years.The government plans to bring in a law to stop rampant plagiarism in academia, with punishment ranging from a warning to deregistration in the case of students and dismissal from service for teachers.
Higher education regulator University Grants Commission (UGC) is finalising a draft law — the first of its kind — that is likely to be sent to the human resource development ministry for further action by June-end. Official sources said the government intends to seek parliamentary approval for the law this year itself.
In the absence of a law, educational institutions deal with cases of plagiarism individually. Last year, the UGC made it mandatory for all universities to use anti-plagiarism software to check PhD theses.
There has been a raft of plagiarism charges against central university vice-chancellors and teachers in recent years.
Pondicherry University V-C Chandra Krishnamurthy quit last month after a prolonged standoff with the HRD ministry, which had kept her on compulsory wait following allegations that she plagiarised large parts of a book mentioned in her CV.
The ministry recently sought Hyderabad Central University V-C Appa Rao Podile’s comments on allegations of plagiarism in research papers co-authored by him.


There have been similar charges against eminent scientists such as CNR Rao and RA Mashelkar in the past.
“A regulation is being prepared for prevention of plagiarism in higher education institutions that will focus on all categories, including students pursuing Masters, MPhil and PhD, and teachers at different levels,” said a senior UGC official.
Students will be let off with a warning if it is a minor case of plagiarism. But as the gravity of the charge increases, they may be barred from submitting a revised manuscript of their thesis or research paper for six months or even have their registration cancelled, said sources privy to the draft law.
“We want to ensure intellectual honesty and academic integrity. There are different levels of punishment depending on seriousness. It could be an advisory, a letter of displeasure, censure (of teachers), et al. In some cases, we are including a provision that such teachers or researchers will not be allowed to publish for a certain period,” said a UGC source.
Former Delhi University V-C Deepak Pental — who faced plagiarism charges that he challenged in court — welcomed the move but said the UGC should not do it in isolation and, instead, consult the Indian National Science Academy and Indian Academy of Science, Bangalore.
“UGC should form a committee to formulate what is plagiarism. Put academic work through plagiarism software. Cut and paste has become very prominent. Sometimes, people do it inadvertently too. We need to work hard against plagiarism and focus on preventive rather than punitive action. If some one still does it, the punishment should come from the universities though legal recourse should be open too,” he said.
........
BUT WHAT HAPPEN CHOR GRURU Prof. ANIL K.RAI ANKIT , Prof.ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY, Prof.RAM MOHAN PATHAK  AND THEIR PROTECTOR V.C.?

Monday, November 30, 2015

88 varshiy purv afasar ko 30 sal bad saja,Kya chor guruyon aur unhe niyukt karane vale bhrast kulapatiyon ko bhi hogi saja?

sattachakra.blogspot.com

88 वर्षीय पूर्व अफसर को 30 साल बाद सजा
पूर्व संयुक्त सचिव पर 1984 से चल रहा था भ्रष्टाचार का केस,
10 लाख जुर्माना व एक साल की कैद
धीरज बेनीवाल
नई दिल्ली। अफसर लोगों की सेवा करने के लिये होते हैं न कि उन्हें वंचित करने या अपनी जेबें भरने के लिए। अगर ऊंचे पदों पर बैठे लोग ऐसे कृत्य करके सार्वजनिक संसाधनों की लूट में शामिल हो जाएंगे तो उन पर विश्वास करने वालों का क्या होगा। यह तल्ख टिप्पणी सीबीआई अदालत ने भ्रष्टाचार के तीस साल पुराने मामले में दोषी 88 साल के पूर्व अफसरशाह को एक साल कैद की सजा सुनाते हुए की है।
सीबीआई ने यह मामला 1984 में पीसी एक्ट 1947 के तहत दर्ज किया था और इसकी सुनवाई 1986 से अदालत में चल रही थी। तीस हजारी अदालत के विशेष सीबीआई जज संजीव अग्रवाल ने भारतीय विधि सेवा के पूर्व संयुक्त सचिव एसके बहादुर को आय से अधिक संपत्ति जमा करने का दोषी ठहराते हुए भ्रष्टाचार रोकथाम अधिनियम 1947 के तहत एक साल कैद की सजा सुनाई है। अदालत ने दोषी पर दस लाख रुपये का जुर्माना भी लगाया है।
अदालत ने अपने फैसले में कहा कि एसके बहादुर की संपत्ति उसकी घोषित आय से 23,77,358 रुपये अधिक पाई गई थी। अदालत ने बहादुर के लॉकर से बरामद 26,78,900 रुपये सरकारी खजाने में जमा करवाने का निर्देश दिया है।
पेश मामले में दोषी पूर्व अफसरशाह ने अपनी अधिक उम्र व तीस साल लंबी कानूनी लड़ाई का हवाला देते हुए उसे नेकचलनी की शर्त पर छोड़ने का आग्रह किया था। उसने दो आवेदन दायर कर कहा था कि उसकी तीन बेटियों की शादी हो चुकी है और उसकी पत्नी बीमार है और बिस्तर पर है। उसकी देखभाल करने वाला कोई नहीं है।
अदालत ने इन दोनों आवेदनों को खारिज करते हुए कहा कि दोषी अधिकारी को नेकचलनी की शर्त पर नहीं छोड़ा जा सकता। अदालत ने सुप्रीम कोर्ट के एक फैसले का हवाला देते हुए कहा कि अगर कोई भी अफसरशाह आपराधिक दुराचार का दोषी पाया जाता है तो उसे कम से कम एक साल और अधिकतम सात साल की सजा देने का प्रावधान है।
अदालत ने भ्रष्टाचार के अपराध को गंभीरता से लेते हुए कहा कि आपराधिक कृत्य दोषी की उम्र अधिक होने से हल्का नहीं हो जाता और न लंबे समय के साथ धुल जाता है। इस तथ्य को अनदेखा नहीं किया जा सकता कि दोषी भारतीय विधिक सेवा का वरिष्ठ अधिकारी था और वाणिज्य मंत्रालय में संयुक्त सचिव व कानूनी सलाहकार पद पर कार्यरत था। इसके बाद भी उसने अपने पद का दुरुपयोग कर अवैध तरीके से अपनी घोषित आय से अधिक संपत्ति अर्जित की। सीबीआई ने 3 दिसंबर 1984 को एसके बहादुर के खिलाफ भ्रष्टाचार के आरोप में एफआईआर दर्ज की थी। एजेंसी को जांच में पता चला कि बहादुर ने अपने पद का दुरुपयोग करते हुए अपनी घोषित आय से अधिक संपत्ति जमा की थी।
उस समय उनके पास कार, बाइक, फ्रिज, एसी, कलर टीवी समेत सुविधा का सभी महंगा सामान था। बहादुर ने अपनी पत्नी के नाम पर कवि नगर, गाजियाबाद में करीब ढाई लाख रुपये का मकान खरीदा था।
* साभार , अमर उजाला,नई दिल्ली,29 नवम्बर 2015,पेज 4