Tuesday, January 27, 2015

US flags fresh concerns over copyrights law

sattachakra.blogspot.com


US flags fresh concerns over copyrights law
Sidhartha,TNN | Jan 24, 2015, 07.06 AM IST
Sources said the US authorities have flagged three major concerns over the recently-amended Copyrights Act, which relate to technological protection and voluntary measures. (Thinkstock photos/Getty Images)
NEW DELHI: Just when the tussle over patents for medicines seems to be coming to an end, the US has flagged concerns over India's new copyrights law ahead of President Barrack Obama's visit. The US is seeking restrictions on the number of times you will be able to read or watch legally downloaded e-books or the latest Hollywood flick.

Sources said the US authorities have flagged three major concerns over the recently-amended Copyrights Act, which relate to technological protection and voluntary measures. If the US move is implemented, it may impact even universities, which legally access e-books but will not be able to print a few pages for circulation among students. The Indian government has rejected the demand.

Similarly, the US wants the law to explicitly provide for restrictions on the number of clicks on a downloaded book or the number of times a song can be played, even if downloaded legally. Further, it wants India to adopt measures to prevent illegal copying of, say, DVDs. For instance, while you will be able watch the movie on the disc after entering a password, you won't be allowed to copy it onto your computer for future views. The move is meant to curb illegal circulation by copying it onto other discs.

Further, the US wants the government to ban manufacture and sale of de-encryption software devices to prevent what it believes is "illegal copying". The American authorities also want restrictions on internet service providers enhanced.

The US wants the law to explicitly provide for restrictions on the number of clicks on a downloaded book or the number of times a song can be played, even if downloaded legally.
The issue, sources confirmed, has been discussed but is unacceptable to the Indian government. They pointed out that the Indian law is in line with India's international commitments.

The concerns come after the American pharma lobby got the US government to raise the issue of patent flexibilities, which allows Indian authorities to reject applications which they believe are not "genuine innovation". The biggest concern was over the patent waiver or compulsory licence that the Patents Office granted to a cancer medicine, which allowed an Indian company to manufacture the same drug on payment of royalty.

Thursday, January 22, 2015

call to bar chorguru & their protector v.c., Call to bar doctors from capitation fee colleges

sattachakra.blogspot.com


  Call to bar doctors from capitation fee colleges
NEW DELHI: The British Medical Journal (BMJ) has called for action over illegal payments to India's private medical colleges. The latest issue of the journal has an article on capitation fees in India's private medical colleges which talks of fundamental reforms needed to tackle corruption in the admission process.

Action is urgently needed to tackle the illegal but seemingly common practice of paying huge fees for admission to India's private medical colleges, warns the special report in the BMJ. Yet another article in the journal suggests that the international community might be able to help tackle the problem by barring Indian students of private medical colleges that allow admission through capitation fee from training jobs abroad.

Speaking to TOI, Dr Samiran Nundy, chairman of the department of surgical gastroenterology and organ transplantation at Sir Ganga Ram Hospital says that with increasing number of candidates paying to get into medicine the quality of graduates was being compromised. He adds that he knows candidates who believed that if they could pay to get a seat, they could also pay to get through the course.

Dr Nundy feels that a common entrance test for admission, as is happening for engineering colleges, combined with an exit exam like the US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) conducted by an independent body could at least ensure a minimum standard for students who become doctors. The USMLE website describes the licensing exam as a three part examination meant to assess a physician's ability to apply knowledge, concepts, and principles, and to demonstrate fundamental patient-centered skills, that are important in health and disease and that constitute the basis of safe and effective patient care.

In a personal view article in the journal, Dr Sanjay Nagral of the Department of Surgical Gastroenterology in Jaslok Hospital & Research Centre, Mumbai,blames the government for the malaise of corrupt private medical colleges. "The state, by not opening more colleges, has created a space for private colleges," says Dr Nagral in his article titled, 'We need to discuss India's reliance on private medical colleges'. He goes on to state that India's medical profession was too entangled in these institutions to offer substantial resistance to their growth and sleaze. Dr Nagral says it might be possible for the international medical community to help by barring students from such colleges from taking training jobs abroad. Whether such a move, which may hurt students more than the institutions, is feasible or effective remains to be seen, he adds.

According to the BMJ article a recent report in the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy ranked the education sector second in a list of black money generators in India. It is estimated that capitation fees paid to professional colleges last year amounted to more than Rs 6000 crore. Despite several judgements of the Supreme Court declaring that charging capitation fees is illegal, the practice continues unabated.

CHORGURU,PROTECTOR V.C. SEE THIS - "ONLINE BABU-BASHING NO CRIME, SAYS SC"

sattachakra.blogspot.com



Online babu-bashing no crime, SC says
Amit Choudhary,TNN | Jan 22, 2015, 04.40 AM IST

The court quashed criminal proceedings against the Bengaluru couple which had accused a police officer of misbehaviour.
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has yet again come to the rescue of common people who give vent to their anguish against official apathy on social networking sites as it said such adverse comments were not a crime under the law.

Saving a Bengaluru-based couple from criminal prosecution for posting adverse comments against the police on the Bangalore Police Facebook page, the court ruled that it was a public forum and a commoner had every right to give vent to his feelings.

The court quashed criminal proceedings against the couple which had accused a police officer of misbehaviour. Upset at the Facebook comment, the police officer lodged an FIR against the couple for offences of criminal intimidation and assault aimed at preventing him from discharging his duty.

Unimpressed by the police's argument justifying filing of the case, a bench of Justices V Gopala Gowda and R Banumathi said mere expression of any word without any intention to cause alarm would not be sufficient to slap charges of criminal intimidation. It said there was also no intention on the part of the couple to obstruct the officer from discharging his duty.

"As far as the comments posted on Facebook are concerned, it appears that it is a public forum meant for helping the public and the act of appellants posting a comment on Facebook may not attract ingredients of criminal intimidation in Section 503 IPC," the court said.

The couple contended that the Facebook page of Bengaluru traffic police was a public forum meant for citizens to discuss and post their grievances and it could not be prosecuted for posting comments against the officer for his misbehavior.

"As noted earlier, the page created by the traffic police on Facebook was a forum for the public to put forth their grievances. In our considered view, the appellants might have posted the comment online under the bona fide belief that it was within the permissible limits. As discussed earlier, even going by the uncontroverted allegations in the FIR, in our view, none of the ingredients of the alleged offences are satisfied," it said.

Accepting the couple's submission, the bench quashed the FIR filed against them.

"We are of the view that in the facts and circumstances of the case, it would be unjust to allow the process of the court to be continued against the appellants and consequently the order of the high court is liable to be set aside," the court said.

The couple, Manik Taneja and wife Sakshi Jawa, met with an accident in June last year when their car collided with an auto. They were taken to police station where an officer allegedly misbehaved and threatened them.

Aggrieved at the manner in which they were treated, the couple posted comments on the Bangalore traffic police's Facebook page, accusing the officer of misbehaviour. The officer lodged a complaint. The couple then approached the Karnataka High Court which refused to quash the FIR.

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

Rajypal Ram Naik ji , Professors ko sevanivrit 58 par karen.chorguruyo , unako bachane,unase sauda karane valon ko barakhast karen



sattachakra.blogspot.com
उ.प्र. के राज्यपाल राम नाईक जी ! सभी प्रोफेसरों ,कुलपतियों आदि की सेवानिवृति उम्र 58 करें,ताकि बेरोजगारों को नौकरी मिले ।
राज्य के सभी प्रोफेसरों, रीडरों, लेक्चररों के शोध पत्र, पीएचडी,डिलिट थिसिस, पुस्तकों की जांच करायें , जो नकल करके लिखे हों उनको बर्खास्त करें,जेल भेजवायें। जो नेट का फर्जी प्रमाण पत्र लगाकर महाविद्यालयों ,विश्वविद्यालयों में पढ़ा रहें हैं,उनकी जांच कराकर जेल भेजवाइये।इसके बारे में काशी विद्यापीठ ,वाराणसी के कुलपति और वीर बहादुर सिंह पूर्वांचल वि.वि. के कुलपतियों से पूछें कि वहां कैसे चोरगुरूओं को बचाया,क्लिनचीट और प्रमोशन दिलवाया गया।  विद्यापीठ में कैसे चोरगुरू से सौदा कर लिया गया।कैसे काशी विद्यापीठ के  तथाकथित जातिवादी व राजनीतिक चोला बदलने में माहिर जुगाड़ी कुलपति ने अपने  प्रोफेसर चोरगुरू को सेवानिवृत हो जाने दिया।
किसी को उदाहरण चाहिए तो देखे कि कैसे चंडीगढ़ उच्च न्यायालय ने निर्णय दिया है कि 58 साल में सेवानिवृत होंगे कर्मचारी।
...........................................................................................
58 साल में ही रिटायर होंगे कर्मचारी
Jan 21, 2015, 06.30AM IST
http://navbharattimes.indiatimes.com/state/punjab-and-haryana/chandigarh/employees-will-retire-in-58-years/articleshow/45956923.cms
प्रमुख संवाददाता, चंडीगढ़
हरियाणा के सरकारी कर्मचारी 58 साल की उम्र में ही रिटायर होंगे। हाईकोर्ट ने मंगलवार को एक महत्वपूर्ण आदेश देते हुए रिटायरमेंट की उम्र बढ़ाने संबंधी कर्मचारियों की याचिका को खारिज कर दिया। यह कर्मचारी वर्ग के लिए एक बड़ा झटका है। रिटायरमेंट एज को बीजेपी सरकार ने 60 से घटाकर 58 कर दिया था। 60 साल में रिटायरमेंट करने का फैसला पूर्ववर्ती कांग्रेसी सरकार ने अपने शासनकाल के अंतिम दिनों में लिया था।
कर्मचारियों ने कुछ समय पहले मौजूदा बीजेपी सरकार के रिटायरमेंट एज घटाने संबंधी फैसले के खिलाफ हाईकोर्ट का दरवाजा खटखटाया था। इन कर्मचारियों को पूर्ववर्ती सरकार ने शासनकाल के अंतिम दिनों में रिटायरमेंट एज बढ़ाकर एक बड़ा तोहफा दिया था। कर्मचारी खुश थे लेकिन मौजूदा सरकार ने पूर्ववर्ती सरकार के तमाम फैसलों की समीक्षा करने का हवाला देते हुए पूर्व सरकार के फैसले को पलट दिया था।
अदालत पहुंचे कर्मचारियों ने अपनी याचिका में इस बात को आधार बनाया था कि बीजेपी सरकार ने राजनीतिक कारणों से रिटायरमेंट एज घटाई है। इनका यह भी कहना था कि आईएएस, ज्यूडिशरी और सरकारी सहायता प्राप्त स्कूलों में रिटायरमेंट की उम्र 60 साल है तो इसी को आधार बनाकर पूर्व सरकार ने रिटायरमेंट की उम्र 58 से बढ़ाकर 60 की थी। इस कर्मचारियों का एक आधार यह भी था कि रिटायरमेंट की उम्र को घटाने वाली खट्टर कैबिनेट में सदस्यों की संख्या कम होने के कारण यह असंवैधानिक है। इस तरह रिटायरमेंट की उम्र को घटाने का फैसला भी पूरी तरह गलत है।
दूसरी ओर मनोहर लाल खट्टर सरकार ने अपने फैसले को पूरी तरह कानून सम्मत करार देते हुए इसे वाजिब करार दिया था। कर्मचारियों को अदालत से मामले में न्याय मिलने की आस थी। सबसे ज्यादा दिलचस्पी उन कर्मचारियों को लगी रही जो आने वाले समय में रिटायर होने वाले हैं।
पिछली सरकार पर सवाल खड़े
हाईकोर्ट ने रिटायरमेंट एज घटाने के मौजूदा सरकार के फैसले को जायज ठहराते हुए पूर्ववर्ती सरकार के समय लिए गए फैसले पर गंभीर सवाल खड़े किए हैं। कोर्ट का मानना था कि राज्य में चुनाव होने वाले थे और आदर्श चुनाव आचार संहिता भी लागू होने वाली थी। ऐसे में तत्कालीन सरकार द्वारा रिटायरमेंट एज पर फैसला लेने से ऐसा प्रतीत होता है कि यह एक विशेष वर्ग का वोट हासिल करने के लिए किया गया था। अदालत का यह भी मानना था कि पूर्व सरकार ने इस बारे में केवल दिशा निर्देश दिए थे और उन्हें विधायी नहीं माना जा सकता। ऐसे में कर्मचारियों को 60 साल की रिटायरमेंट एज बढ़ाने का अधिकार ही नहीं बनता था।